Much of Glidden's story, though, focuses on her journalist friends, and the work they do. It's no secret that news organizations have significantly reduced their foreign staff, and that reporting has suffered as a result. There are very few reporters abroad with long-term contacts, and so they cannot report on longer-term, slower burn stories. We understand the world less because of it. Governments are more corrupt because of it. Reporters are less safe because of it. We are all less accountable to each other, from individuals to governments to multi-national corporations, because of it.
Glidden's book highlights some of this loss to us. She shows us an Iraq that suffered through war but still has culture, friendship, delicious food, and beauty. Some Iraqis are happy that Americans came, mostly because they suffered deeply under Saddam Hussein. Others hate Americans for ruining their way of life. I really enjoyed the way Glidden's friends shared stories of Iraqis in multiple countries to provide a broader perspective. I also liked the way Glidden used light, bright colors in her art to humanize the experience of so many people whose lives have been upended so completely. Not only the Iraqi refugees themselves, but the lives of the Turks and Syrians as well.
It was particularly chilling to read the Syrian section of this book, as I was reading it while the US bombed Syria after Assad used chemical weapons on his own people. The book is set some years ago, I think before the full horrors of the Syrian war. Now I realize just how much the world missed by not having reporters in Syria to cover Assad, so that it felt as though the whole war came out of nowhere. (At least, it felt that way to me. No doubt others were better informed.)
I was less enamored with the story around Dan, the Iraqi war veteran. I feel like his return to Iraq and his opacity in sharing his feelings and whether his feelings about the war and his participation in it took up an outsize amount of the story. In a way, it felt very "Yes, of course, focus on the white guy's story because that would be the most compelling to everyone." I don't think that is fair to Glidden's reporter friends, but it seemed like Glidden wanted to focus the most on that story. She even ends that story arc quite dramatically, with something like, "Sarah never interviewed Dan again" as the only words on a whole page. Which makes it sound like either Sarah or Dan died, but neither of them did, and they continued to stay friends and talk to each other, she just didn't interview him again about the war.
That aside, though, I really appreciated Glidden's book and her focus on how journalists make decisions on stories, angles, ethics, and so many other things. It was very illuminating, and I highly recommend seeking it out if you enjoy Joe Sacco's work or Brooke Gladstone's The Influencing Machine. (Teresa, I'm looking at you!)